头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克的系统文献分析

张金红, 房德敏, 高颖, 侯微, 刘志永, 戴滨

中国药学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12) : 1024-1030.

PDF(1166 KB)
PDF(1166 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12) : 1024-1030. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2019.12.017
论著

头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克的系统文献分析

  • 张金红a, 房德敏a*, 高颖a, 侯微a, 刘志永b, 戴滨a
作者信息 +

Systematic Retrospective and Review of Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Cefazolin Sodium with Negative Skin Test

  • ZHANG Jin-honga, FANG De-mina*, GAO Yinga, HOU Weia, LIU Zhi-yongb, DAI Bina
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 系统综述与分析头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克的临床特点,以期为头孢唑林钠的安全合理应用提供依据。方法 计算机检索PUBMED、EMBASE、CBM、CNKI、VIP、WANFANG等数据库,时间截至2017年10月,纳入头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克的中英文病例报道,两位研究者独立文献筛选、数据提取及统计。结果 共检出文献1 358篇,最终纳入18篇。涉及患者20例,中位年龄39.0岁,60.0%患者无青霉素或药物过敏史,30.0%患者曾用过青霉素或头孢类抗菌药物,静脉滴注为主要给药途径。发生于30 min以内的速发型过敏性休克占47.6%,时间最长可发生在用药第7天,临床表现以循环系统损害为主,抢救措施包括立即停药、平卧、建立静脉通道、吸氧、给予血管活性药物和糖皮质激素等抗休克治疗,最终全部抢救成功。ADR关联性评价为肯定有关1例,很可能有关19例。结论 头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克需引起临床关注,青年、速发型过敏性休克比例高。以头孢唑林钠皮试结果预测过敏反应的价值有限,用药前掌握患者用药史和过敏史,重视全程用药监护,尤其用药30 min内,同时必须准备好过敏性休克的急救措施。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To systematicly review and analyse the clinical characteristics of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium with negative skin test, and provide a basis for the safe and reasonable application of cefazolin sodium. METHODS Databases of PUBMED, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WANFANG data(from built to October 2017)were conducted for case reports published in English or Chinese involving anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium. Literatures were screened, extracted and statistic analysed by two authors independently. RESULTS A total of 1 358 literatures were searched out and 18 were included involving 20 patients, the median age was 39.0 years, 60.0% of the patients had no history of penicillin or drug allergy, and 30.0% of the patients had used penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotics, and intravenous infusion was the main route of administration. Anaphylactic shock occurred within 30 min accouted for 47.6%, and the longest time occurred on the 7th day of medication. The clinical manifestations were mainly circulatory system damage, and the rescue measures included discontinuation of medicine immediately, prostration, establishment of intravenous channels, oxygen uptake, administration of vasoactive drugs and glucocorticoids, etc., all of which were eventually successfully rescued.The correlation evaluation of ADR was definite and probable in 1 and 19 cases, respectively. CONCLUSION High attention should be put on anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium with negative skin test. The proportion of young people and immediate anaphylactic shock were high.The cefazolin sodium skin test is of little value in predicting anaphylaxis. History of medication and allergies of patients should be taken in detail before medication, and the whole-process of medication, especially within 30 min should be closely monitored. Emergency rescue measures of anaphylactic shock should be prepared in advance.

关键词

头孢唑林钠 / 皮试阴性 / 过敏性休克 / 不良反应 / 系统分析

Key words

cefazolin sodium / negative skin test / anaphylactic shock / adverse drug reaction / systematic retrospective study

引用本文

导出引用
张金红, 房德敏, 高颖, 侯微, 刘志永, 戴滨. 头孢唑林钠皮试阴性致过敏性休克的系统文献分析[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2019, 54(12): 1024-1030 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2019.12.017
ZHANG Jin-hong, FANG De-min, GAO Ying, HOU Wei, LIU Zhi-yong, DAI Bin. Systematic Retrospective and Review of Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Cefazolin Sodium with Negative Skin Test[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2019, 54(12): 1024-1030 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2019.12.017
中图分类号: R969.3   

参考文献

[1] WANG F, ZHANG Y Y. Practical Anti-infective Therapy(实用抗感染治疗学)[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:People′s Medical Publishing House, 2013:222-224.
[2] Revision working group of guiding principle of clinical application of antibacterials. Guiding Principle of Clinical Application of Antibacterials(抗菌药物临床应用指导原则)[M]. Beijing:People′s Medical Publishing House, 2015:22-38.
[3] LIN W Q. Literature analysis of 377 cases of cefazolin injection-induced ADR[J]. J China Pharm(中国药房), 2015, 26(6):743-745.
[4] MA X J. Discussion on the standardized application of cephalosporin antibiotics from the misunderstanding of the skin test[J]. Chin J Intern Med(中华内科杂志), 2014, 53(6):433-434.
[5] CHINA FOOD AND ADMINISTRATION, MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH OF CHINA. Measures for the reporting and monitoring of adverse drug reactions[J]. Adverse Drug React J(药物不良反应杂志), 2011, 13(3):173-179.
[6] WANG Q. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin[J]. J Mudanjiang Med Coll(牡丹江医学院学报), 1990, 11(3):160.
[7] KONNO R, NAGASE S. Anaphylactic reaction to cefazolin in pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 1995, 21(6):577-579.
[8] DENG H Z. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by intramuscular injection of cefazolin[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm(中国医院药学杂志), 1997, 17(6):283.
[9] YAO J K, YAN S B. A case of anaphylactic shock caused by cefazolin with negative skin test [J]. J Pediat Pharm(儿科药学杂志), 1998, 4(2):41.
[10] PENG W Q, CAO W Q. Two cases of delayed anaphylactic shock induced by intravenous cefazolin sodium[J]. Chin J School Doc(中国校医), 1999, 13(5):365-366.
[11] WANG Z C. Rescue and nursing care for delayed anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium[J]. Hebei J Integr Tradit Chin Western Med(河北中西医结合杂志), 1999, 8(1):144.
[12] PAN A M, YANG R D. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin[J]. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin Western Med(现代中西医结合杂志), 2001, 10(20):1985.
[13] FENG L G. Anaphylactic shock caused by cefazolin with negative skin test[J]. Adverse Drug React J(药物不良反应杂志), 2003, 5(3):201-202.
[14] GAO J D. Two cases of acute myocardial infarction caused by anaphylactic shock of cefazolin sodium[J]. Adverse Drug React J(药物不良反应杂志), 2003, 5(3):193-194.
[15] NIU Y H, ZHANG X Y. Anaphylactic shock caused by repeated use of cefazolin sodium[J]. Clin Misdiag Misther(临床误诊误治), 2003, 16(4):310.
[16] LI Z W. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin[J]. Mod Diagn Treat(现代诊断与治疗), 2007, 18(4):248.
[17] MENG Q F. A case of delayed anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium[J]. J Snake(蛇志), 2007, 19(4):327.
[18] LI M L, ZHANG X J, WANG S X, et al. Clinical observation of a case of anaphylactic shock induced by intravenous injection of cefazolin sodium[J]. J Qilu Nursing(齐鲁护理杂志), 2008, 14(3):2.
[19] LIN W L, CHEN Y. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by injection of cefazolin sodium[J]. Strait Pharm J(海峡药学), 2008, 20(9):159-160.
[20] A E D. A case of delayed adverse reaction of cefazolin sodium[J]. Northwest Pharm J(西北药学杂志), 2009, 24(4):270.
[21] DENG H. A case of anaphylaxis shock induced by intramuscular injection of cefazolin[J]. J Med Forum(医药论坛), 2009, 1(4):246.
[22] WEI G S, SHI X J, LIU D Z. A case of anaphylaxis shockinduced by cefazolin[J]. Clin Misdiag Misther(临床误诊误治), 2010, 10(4):1008.
[23] LIU H H, LIU H D. Nursing experience of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium [J]. World Health Digest(中外健康文摘), 2013:199.
[24] Antibiotics professional committee of Beijing Pharmaceutical Association. Expert consensus on the high end forum on the skin allergy test of cephalosporins[J]. Clin Med J(临床药物治疗杂志), 2008, 6(4):1-2.
[25] YU X, TANG R F. Academic dispute over the allergy test of antimicrobial agents[J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志), 2010, 45(15):1193-1194.
[26] SI Y B, ZHAO Z G. Investigation and analysis of the skin test of cephalosporins in hospitals from someareas in China[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol(中国临床药理学杂志),2009, 25(2):161-162.
[27] Editorial board of Chinese National Formulary. Chinese National Formulary(中国国家处方集)[M]. 1st ed. Beijing:People′s Military Medical Publishing House, 2010:425-426.
[28] CHEN X Q, JIN Y Y, TANG G. New Materia Medica(新编药物学)[M]. 17th ed. Beijing:People′s Medical Publishing House, 2011:47-49.
[29] Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Guidelines for Pharmacopoeia of the People′s Republic of China(中华人民共和国药典临床用药须知)[M]. Beijing:China Medical Science Press, 2017:650-653.
[30] ZHENG B. Objective to treat the skin test of cephalosporin antibiotics[J]. Clin J Intern Med(中华内科杂志), 2014, 53(6):435-436.
[31] TANG Y, WANG L, MEI D, et al. Analysis of serious adverse drug reactions of anti-infective drugs[J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志), 2014, 49(22):2036-2038.
[32] YANG M S, KANG D Y, SEO B, et al. Incidence of cephalosporin-induced anaphylaxis and clinical efficacy of screening intradermal tests with cephalosporins:a large multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. Allergy, 2018, 73(9):1833-1841.
[33] MA X J, ZHOU J. Questioning the necessity of cephalosporin skin test[J]. Adverse Drug React J(药物不良反应杂志), 2014, 16(2):71.
[34] YOON S Y, PARK S Y, KIM S, et al. Validation of the cephalosporin intradermal skin test for predicting immediate hypersensitivity:a prospective study with drug challenge[J]. Allergy, 2013, 68(7):938-944.
[35] LV Y L. A case of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin[J]. J Med Theor Pract(医学理论与实践), 2005, 18(1):105.
[36] CHEN Q, TANG M. Case analysis of anaphylactic shock induced by cefazolin sodium pentahydrate[J]. Pharm Care Res(药学服务与研究), 2016, 16(1):63-66.
[37] ROMANO A, GUANT-RODRIGUEZ R M, VIOLA M, et al. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 141(1):16-22.
[38] PICHICHEROM E. A review of evidence supporting the American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendation for Prescribing Cephalosporin Antibiotics for Penicillin-allergic Patients[J]. Pediat, 2005, 115(4):1048-1057.
[39] BUONOMO A, NUCERA E, PECORA V, et al. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with cell-mediated allergy to penicillins[J]. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2014, 24(5):331-337.
[40] WANG P. Literature analysis of 1 111 cases of anaphylactic shock[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm(中国医院药学杂志), 2013(4):331-332.
[41] YAO X Y, MENG X M. Literature analysis of 121 cases of anaphylactic shock induced by cephalosporin injection with negative skin test[J]. Chin J Pharmacov(中国药物警戒), 2015, 12(6):352-356.
PDF(1166 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/